Skip to content

App Store rejectionGuideline 2.3.1 - Performance - Accurate Metadata

Guideline 2.3.1(a) says every new feature, function and product change must be described specifically in the Notes for Review section of App Store Connect, and must be accessible for review. Generic descriptions will be rejected, and misleading marketing, such as promoting content or services the app does not actually offer or a false price, is grounds for removal from the App Store.

Short answer

Rewrite the Notes for Review as a specific list: each new feature, where to find it, and how to reach it. In App Review Information, add a valid demo account if features need sign-in, and the specifics of any special configuration. Be ready to provide a demo video or the hardware for anything that needs hard-to-replicate setup. Remove claims from the listing and marketing that the app can’t back up, then resubmit.

Rather not fix it yourself? App Fix Ticket starts with a fixed-price diagnosis, then a fixed price for the fix before any fix work.

Why Apple flagged the review notes, and the fix

  1. 01

    The review notes are generic

    “All new features, functionality, and product changes must be described with specificity in the Notes for Review section of App Store Connect (generic descriptions will be rejected)” Apple, Guideline 2.3.1(a)

    Guideline 2.3.1(a) says generic descriptions will be rejected. Describe each new feature, function and product change with specificity, and say where it is.

  2. 02

    The reviewer can’t reach the feature

    “If some features require signing in, provide a valid demo account username and password.” Apple, App Review: incomplete information

    Guideline 2.3.1(a) says new features must be accessible for review. If some features require signing in, enter a valid demo account in the App Review Information section of App Store Connect.

  3. 03

    The feature needs special setup or hardware

    “If features require an environment that is hard to replicate or require specific hardware, be prepared to provide a demo video or the hardware.” Apple, App Review: incomplete information

    If there are special configurations to set, include the specifics in App Review Information. If a feature needs an environment that is hard to replicate or specific hardware, be prepared to provide a demo video or the hardware.

  4. 04

    The marketing promises something the app doesn’t do

    “promoting content or services that it does not actually offer (such as iOS-based virus and malware scanners) or promoting a false price” Apple, Guideline 2.3.1(a)

    Also check: the listing, ads and website only promote features and prices the app really has.

Checked against the vendor’s docs on : Apple: App Review Guidelines, 2.3 Accurate Metadata; Apple: App Review (replying and appeals).

Rather hand it over?

Fixed scope, fixed price, paid upfront. The work happens in writing; no call needed.

Resubmit before Apple’s holiday slowdown

Pay for the Diagnosis and send the rejection and access to the app by (US Eastern). The Diagnosis is back by . Pay for the Fix that day and it arrives as a pull request by , in time to build and resubmit before .

In past years Apple said reviews may take longer around the holidays: December 20 to 26 in 2024 (opens in a new tab), December 22 to 27 in 2023 (opens in a new tab), December 23 to 27 in 2022 (opens in a new tab). Apple hasn’t posted its 2026 dates yet (checked ). Approval stays Apple’s decision.

“Very responsive, attentive to fixing bugs, and completed the project as needed! Thank you!”
A buyer in the United States, July 2022. Shopify on Fiverr
All 127 Fiverr reviews

Related: App Store Guideline 2.1 app completeness · App Store Guideline 2.3 accurate metadata · App Store Guideline 2.3.12 What’s New text · App Store Guideline 3.1.2

Questions

More on this rejection

Should I reply to App Review or appeal?

Reply first. Apple says you can correspond with App Review in App Store Connect to resolve the issues before resubmitting, which is the place for a demo account, a screen recording or an explanation. Appeal to the App Review Board only if you believe App Review misunderstood the app or treated you unfairly. Apple allows one appeal per rejected submission and asks for specific reasons the app complies.

Can a 2.3.1 rejection affect the developer account?

It can. Guideline 2.3.1 says misleading marketing is grounds for removing the app and terminating the developer account, and 2.3.1(b) says egregious or repeated behavior is grounds for removal from the Apple Developer Program.

Can you fix it for me?

Yes, through the App Fix Ticket: you send the rejection message and access to the app, Simon writes a diagnosis of what App Review hit and how to fix it, then fixes the code so you can resubmit. Each step has a fixed price, paid upfront. Approval stays Apple’s decision; the ticket covers the fix.

A different error?

Describe it and get a written quote

Send the error and what you were doing. You get a written scope, a fixed price and a timeline; Simon replies by email, usually within one business day.